Frank Rich's sobering, must-read Op-Ed in this past Saturday's NYT has served to finally shine a spotlight on the real issue at play in today's Tea Party movement.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/opinion/28rich.html
His breakdown of the current (supposedly Healthcare related) divide in this country has, in my mind, put the onus of any violent, hate-related outcomes squarely at the feet of those who've given legitimacy to the radical fringe of this movement. As Don Corleone would say, "I'm a superstitious man..."
For better or worse, in this country we elect based on a two-party system. And like it or not, 'Tea Party' has become synonymous with 'Republican.' As stated by Rich, 76% self-identified. So when Dems stand in opposition to statements made by TP members, they're naturally seen as simply mouthing the usual left-wing 'talking points.' You say, "I consider myself a conservative but I don't subscribe to the violence-inciting rhetoric." I'm glad to hear it, but I'm afraid it can't end there. Because it isn't just about GOP leadership lending their support by standing up and speaking at TP rallies. When you talk with your normally like-minded, conservative friends and notice their words beginning to skew from legitimate opposition to hate speech, it becomes you're responsibility speak up. And if you're not inclined to do so, you might want to check to make sure that the hateful words you're hearing aren't coming from your own mouth.
-TRS
Cartoon: Breaking news
22 hours ago